Julius Caesar: Dramatic Irony 6 key examples

Caesar's sense for Cassius's political ambition is absolutely correct, of course: in anticipating his potential for ruthlessness, Caesar unwittingly foreshadows Cassius's instrumental role in the plot against him that will eventually lead to his assassination. As this is a historical play, Caesar's death is likely familiar to the audience as a historical event—nonetheless, Shakespeare seizes upon this opportunity to stoke the ironic potential of the moment: Antony denies Cassius’s danger and advocates on behalf of the man, even as Caesar suspects (and the audience knows) that Cassius could plot against him. Caesar, for his part, dismisses this concern and follows Antony’s lead, insisting that he has no fear of Cassius—Caesar constantly asserts his manhood in Julius Caesar, and this sequence is no exception. 

Shakespeare uses passages like these to toy with the audience's sense of suspense and the possibility that Caesar—if he were just a bit more perceptive—would be able to avoid his death. It is never quite clear whether or not Caesar’s fate is preordained: even he himself can see that something is coming, and yet Antony seemingly allows it to happen by absolving Cassius of any criticism.

A mysterious soothsayer warning Caesar to beware the ides of March is an obvious example of foreshadowing. But this sequence also sets up the dramatic irony that will persist through to Caesar's assassination: Cassius, who asks the Soothsayer to repeat himself, is the very architect of the reason the Soothsayer warns Caesar in the first place. Caesar will keep Cassius close even as the audience grows increasingly familiar with Cassius's intentions and his conspiracy against Caesar, until it is too late.

Caesar displays his typical masculine arrogance in dismissing the Soothsayer as a "dreamer"—the first in a long line of warnings Caesar will dismiss up until his death as he attempts to enforce his masculinity and preserve his image of unassailable stability. Julius Caesar is one long exploration of the dangers of pride in a society constructed on manhood and honor, and Caesar is the central example of how deadly arrogance can be. 

As with many soliloquies in Shakespearean tragedy, Brutus's speech is an important source of dramatic irony. By thinking out loud, he informs the audience of his intentions to help kill Caesar while Caesar himself remains in denial about any threat to his life.

This soliloquy is also significant for what Brutus reveals about how the political class of Julius Caesar wields its power: the many speeches politicians make throughout the play will appeal sometimes to emotion, sometimes to logic and reason. But the best, most equitable leaders will appeal to both emotion and reason. To Brutus, Caesar seems beholden only to logic—he shows no remorse, and is not swayed by his "affections"—and is therefore quite dangerous: the "abuse of greatness" comes when one's emotion fails to hold one's ambition for power in check. One of Shakespeare's chief concerns in Julius Caesar is the role of morality in politics, and this is Brutus's perception of how to rule morally.

Witness to a long list of omens and a fair share of soliloquies, there is no doubt for the audience as to what is at stake as Caesar continues to refuse to listen to the world around him. In Caesar’s view, however, gods will do what they do—he might as well continue to live life unburdened. Caesar does not appear to believe that he has much agency in his determining his fate, and his attitude continues Shakespeare's paradoxical exploration of human decision-making in a classical world of predestination to an especially frustrating conclusion. It would appear, at least to the audience, that Caesar's stubbornness leads him to directly his death. His insistence in staying his course feels more like arrogance than genuine submission to the gods' will.

In this letter, Artemidorus spells out the entire scope of the threats to Caesar borne by his supposed allies and peers. By including this scene, Shakespeare both foreshadows Caesar's assassination and establishes the beginning of a long chain of dramatic irony to come: Artemidorus, just like the audience, knows full well that Caesar's life is at risk and tries to inform him before it is too late; Caesar's death may be preventable. Shortly hereafter, in Act 3, Scene 1, the dramatic irony will reach its peak when Caesar refuses to read the letter. 

The inclusion of this short scene heightens the tensions of the play and gives the audience a false sense of security. Shakespeare will continue to stoke suspense with Caesar's continued obliviousness in the face of increasingly obvious omens and several urgent attempts to alert him to his impending death. Throughout the first half of Julius Caesar, it is unclear whether or not there is any alternative to Caesar's assassination: is the man's fate guaranteed, or can he escape it? The question of Caesar's agency in avoiding his demise lies at the heart of Shakespeare's exploration of the power of human decision-making to change one's destiny.

Caesar compares himself to the North Star—one fixed celestial body, unwavering even as the heavens swirl around him. In this constancy, Caesar believes he is “unassailable.” His speech is rife with dramatic irony, as the audience is by now well aware of the murderous plot against him and have witnessed on numerous occasions Caesar’s refusal to acknowledge the many signs (supernatural or otherwise) of his coming assassination.

This speech embodies the very thing that Caesar's enemies purport to fear—a constant, unwavering Caesar with the absolute power of a monarch. In asserting his power so forcefully, Caesar unwittingly validates Cassius's criticism and Brutus's fears. Sure enough, just a few lines after his speech concludes, the senators will assassinate him. Shakespeare presents unchecked bravado as a weakness rather than a strength in Julius Caesar, and this sequence shows that even absolute self-certainty can only get one so far.