LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in For Whom the Bell Tolls, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
Love in War
Cultural Connections
Violence, Cowardice, and Death
The Eternality of the Present
Summary
Analysis
Robert Jordan compares the war to a “merry-go-round,” though not the kind found in cities with children riding on cows with “gilded horns”: instead, it is a “wheel that goes up and around,” with “no prizes.” He reflects that the group has ended up back where they started: “There is only one turn; one large, elliptical, rising and falling turn and you are back where you have started.” While studying his drawings of the bridge, Maria looks over his shoulder; he writes out the operation orders, thinking that the “business of Pablo is something with which [he] should never have been saddled.” He does not want to get on the “wheel” again, since he has been on it twice before.
Robert Jordan sees the war as directionless, represented by the ever-turning wheel: despite the Republicans’ best efforts, defeat is inevitable, and he begins to feel as if they will never make any progress against the fascists. He has seen military failure before (he has been on the “wheel” twice already), and even as he tries to maintain his faith in the Republican cause, he finds himself pulled back toward feelings of frustration and hopelessness.
Active
Themes
Quotes
Literary Devices
Pablo says that he has been working on “the problem of the retreat”; Jordan looks at his “drunken pig eyes” and asks him how it is going. He realizes that Pablo is not “getting on the wheel either.” The “drunkards and those who are truly mean or cruel ride until they die,” and he decides that he is off the wheel completely.
Hemingway extends the metaphor of the wheel, suggesting that the only fighters who can stay resolute in the face of the challenges and horrors of war are “drunkards” and “those who are truly mean or cruel.” Even Pablo, though occasionally drunk and cruel, is not one of those men, in Jordan’s view: both Pablo and Jordan have essentially given up on the war.
Active
Themes
Two days ago, Jordan never knew that “Pilar, Pablo nor the rest of the world existed,” and he did not know about Maria, either; “it was certainly a much simpler world.” Before meeting the group, he expected to blow up the bridge, and he wanted to ask for time off after to go to Madrid, buy some books, and go to the Florida Hotel for a hot bath. After, he would go to Gaylord’s and eat with Karkov.
Even before he met Pilar, Pablo, Maria, and the rest of the guerillas, Jordan was beginning to feel tired of the war: he wanted to leave after the bridge offensive and spend some time relaxing in Madrid. Now, though, he sees that his life is inextricably linked with the guerillas’ lives: he sees that the situation they are facing is dire, and he begins to realize that he may not be getting out of it alive.
Active
Themes
Gaylord’s is the hotel that the Russians took over in Madrid, where he met famous peasant and worker Spanish commanders. Many of them spoke Russian, since they fled the country after the 1934 revolution failed, and in Russia, they were sent to military academies to learn to fight for the Communist cause. Gaylord’s was where Robert Jordan learned “how it was all really done instead of how it was supposed to be done,” and it helped him to learn the truth about war.
In addition to foreign volunteers like Robert Jordan, the Soviets played a major role in the Spanish Civil War, helping to train Communist soldiers allied with the Republican forces. Many Spanish Communists adopted aspects of Russian culture, creating cross-cultural ties.
Active
Themes
Get the entire For Whom the Bell Tolls LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
Now that Maria has come into his life, Jordan thinks that when the bridge offensive is over, they will have to get two rooms in Madrid, and he will go to Gaylord’s during the day and come back for her. He wants to take her to see the Marx Brothers at the Opera. Jordan recalls that Kashkin was the first to take him to Gaylord’s, to meet Karkov, “the most intelligent man he had ever met,” with “more brains and more inner dignity and outer insolence and humor than any man that he had ever known.” Kashkin was only “tolerated” at Gaylord’s: Jordan thinks that there was “something wrong” with him that he was “working out” in Spain. Through Kashkin, though, he became friends with Karkov, his wife, and his mistress, and he thinks that he would like to introduce Maria to Karkov, too.
Though Jordan has not let himself think too much about the future (preferring to focus on the “now”), he can’t help thinking about the life he might be able to lead with Maria after the war, when they are able to return to Madrid; he also thinks about Karkov, a Soviet commander who embodies true intelligence, courage, and “humor,” serving as one of the few uncorrupted soldiers left on the Republicans’ side. Jordan compares Karkov to Kashkin, who was also a Soviet, albeit far more troubled than the unflappable, confident Karkov. Jordan thinks that Kashkin was disturbed before the war, and fighting didn’t help his mental state.
Active
Themes
Jordan sees Pablo “engaged in his military studies” across the table from him, and he wonders what sort of guerilla leader he would have been in the American Civil War. Jordan’s grandfather always claimed that Ulysses S. Grant was a drunk, though he functioned “perfectly normally no matter how much he drank.” Jordan has not seen any military geniuses in this war, though there are Communists and disciplinarians. Gaylord’s was “the opposite” of the Communism espoused at Velazquez 63, the International Brigade headquarters in Madrid, or the headquarters of the Fifth Regiment, where it felt as if you are “taking part in a crusade”: “it gave you a part in something that you could believe in wholly and completely.”
Jordan begins to draw parallels between the American Civil War and the Spanish Civil War: drunkenness, he realizes, may have been a part of the American Civil War, too. He also reflects on the different attitudes toward the war that he has seen throughout his time as a soldier, including the Communists’ project of “crusading,” versus the attitudes found at Gaylord’s, where Jordan has learned the “truth” of the war—its hypocrisies and false promises.
Active
Themes
Literary Devices
Yet in the fighting, Jordan realizes, “there was no purity of feeling for those who survived the fighting and were not good at it.” In the sierra, men had been cowards and deserted; Jordan believes that it was necessary that the men were shot by fascists as they ran away. He remembers the fear “that dries your mouth and your throat,” the “dry-mouthed, fear-purged, purging ecstasy of battle.” Back then, though, in the early days of the war, there was no Gaylord’s.
Jordan feels little empathy for the deserters he has seen: even though he can vividly recall the terrifying (though simultaneously “ecstatic”) feeling of facing violence in battle, he firmly believes that deserters—men who were fearful of the war and not “good” at fighting—are cowards who deserve to die, affirming his strict attitudes about masculinity and the necessity of courage in battle.
Active
Themes
Quotes
Literary Devices
At the start of the war, Karkov had three wounded Russians in the Palace Hotel whom he was trying to keep safe; if Madrid was abandoned, Karkov was supposed to poison them to “destroy all evidence of their identity.” Karkov said that he did not look forward to the act, though he showed Robert Jordan the poison he carried around always. After fighting in the Sierra in the early days of the war, Jordan begins to think that he corrupts “very easily”; still, most people in most professions do, except for doctors, priests, soldiers, and Nazis.
Jordan views Karkov as brave, principled, and utterly loyal to the Republican cause—evidenced by his willingness to kill his fellow soldiers, despite the trauma this act might provoke, in order to defend their secrets. Jordan, though, feels that he is corruptible and weakened by his time in the war, though he also reflects that being a soldier is a profession like any other: as in other professions, there are duties that he must carry out.
Active
Themes
Literary Devices
Jordan thinks about a British economist Karkov admired who had written about Spain. Once, he spotted the man during the afternoon that the Republicans attacked at Carabanchel, while he was trying to cart a dead man out of an armored car to appropriate it. The economist came up, offered Jordan a cigarette, and asked him to explain to him “something about the fighting.” Robert Jordan cursed at him, though Karkov later tells him that “he was enormous” at Toledo, instrumental in the success of the siege. Karkov believes that he only has the “face of a conspirator,” and that he is not as close to the Comintern (the Soviet Communists) as he pretends to be. Karkov calls him a “winter fool,” a “big man” who comes to a house in winter and shakes snow off of his clothes into the house.
Jordan’s recollections of the British economist call to mind the different sorts of non-Spanish individuals who have signed up for the war. Though the economist is also working for the Republican cause, leading the Republican army to success at the siege in Toledo, Karkov regards him with suspicion: the British man has made himself out to be close to the Soviets, but Karkov believes that this is a false impression. Jordan sees himself as a true combatant, embedded in the war, whereas the British economist is a meddler; Karkov sees him as false and self-serving. Both Karkov and Jordan believe themselves to be foreign fighters who are motivated to defend the Republican cause for the right reasons, whereas the British economist is only out for himself.
Active
Themes
Jordan tells Karkov that he doesn’t know whether he’ll be able to be a professor when he returns to the United States, since he will be suspected of being a “Red” (Communist), and Karkov suggests he come to the Soviet Union and continue his studies there. Karkov says that he wishes to write literature and that he has been studying the writings of the Spanish fascist Calvo Sotelo; he believes that it was “intelligent” that he was killed, and he says that he believes in political assassination. Karkov says that he has just come back from Valencia, and that unlike Madrid, where he feels “good and clean and with no possibility of anything but winning,” Valencia is governed by cowards. He also discusses the killing of the Communists known as the P.O.U.M. (Workers’ Party of Marxist Unification), who made a plot to kill him at one point.
It is clear that Robert Jordan has developed a number of his beliefs from Karkov, since Jordan has also expressed support for the idea of killing individuals for their disloyalty (deserters or, as Karkov mentions, political enemies). Karkov also has strong ideas about cowardice and maintaining faith in the idea of “winning.”
Active
Themes
Literary Devices
Karkov tells Jordan that he thinks he writes “absolutely true,” and that is why he wants to tell him “some things” about the war. Jordan decides that he will write a book when he is through with the war, “but only about the things he knew, truly, and about what he knew.” Still, he will have to be a “much better writer” than he is now to handle those things.
Though Jordan has seen and heard much about Spanish culture and society during the war, he still feels overwhelmed by what he knows and has come to learn about the nature of violence, death, and warfare. He feels that he is not a strong enough writer to express these challenging subjects, perhaps reflecting Hemingway’s own insecurities.