Second Treatise of Government

by

John Locke

The Dissolution of Government Theme Analysis

Themes and Colors
Nature, War, and Civil Society Theme Icon
Consent of the Governed and the Role of Government Theme Icon
Power and Absolute Monarchies Theme Icon
The Dissolution of Government Theme Icon
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Second Treatise of Government, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
The Dissolution of Government Theme Icon

As Locke’s Second Treatise of Government outlines the ways in which a civil society can be created and maintained through a formal government, he also outlines the ways in which a government can be dissolved. Locke is quick to point out that the dissolution of government is not the same as the dissolution of society. A society, which is created through consent and agreement into a common-wealth, can exist without government; however, government, which is in fact a part of society, cannot exist without the common-wealth. In this light, the only way for a society to be dissolved is though foreign invasion and conquest. Government, on the other hand, can be dissolved by numerous internal and external factors, and in certain circumstances, Locke even supports such dissolution. With his examination of the dissolution of government in the Second Treatise of Government, Locke effectively argues that since society and government are the result of a social contract and consent, any dissolution of the government that does not come directly from the people is illegitimate.

Locke examines three separate ways in which a government can be dissolved: by conquest, by usurpation, and by tyranny. He maintains that each of these forms of dissolution are perpetrated without the consent of the people, which makes them illegitimate. Conquest, which is assuming control of a society or government by force, does not give the conqueror power over all. According to Locke, “if there were any that consented not to the war, and over the children of the captives themselves, or the possessions of either, he has no power; and so can have, by virtue of conquest, no lawful title himself to dominion over them.” While the conqueror does have “despotical power” over those who agree and give consent to the conquest, the conqueror does not have power over those who dissent. As Locke claims that a conquest is often called a “foreign usurpation,” it stands to reason that a usurpation “is a kind of domestic conquest,” which makes a usurpation illegitimate as well. Locke claims that a usurper—one who tries to assume another’s power as their own—“can never have right on his side,” as one can never come “into the possession of what another has right to.” In short, a usurper is not given consent, thus they can have no real power. Lastly, Locke outlines tyranny, or “the exercise of power beyond right, which no body can have a right to.” Much like a usurper, a tyrant operates without the consent of the people, and without consent, the power exercised by a tyrant is likewise illegitimate.

While the government can be dissolved from an outside force, Locke contends that it can be dissolved from inside the government as well, which can be just as destructive. Government can be dissolved “when the legislative is altered.” Legislative power is altered when the governing body begins to pass arbitrary laws, the very thing the legislative is not allowed to do. Arbitrary laws do not benefit the people of the common-wealth, nor do the governed consent to these measures, and the government is thereby dissolved. Government can also be dissolved whenever laws or power is altered without the consent of the people. Unauthorized changes in government lead to an altered legislative, which again dissolves the government. The dissolution of government also occurs if the monarchy prevents the legislative from meeting and acting freely. When a king interferes with the assembly of the legislative, it is effectively altered, which, according to Locke, “puts an end to the government.” The legislative works directly for the people, and if that work is prohibited, government cannot stand. Lastly, Locke argues, government is dissolved whenever the common-wealth is subjected to a foreign power, by either the monarchy or the legislative. Subjecting a common-wealth to a foreign power leads to “a change of the legislative, and so a dissolution of the government.” As the purpose of government is to produce a free and independent society, this is automatically lost under the control of a foreign power.

Locke maintains that the power given to the common-wealth by the individual will remain with the common-wealth as long as it survives, and cannot be reverted back to the individual. Power must remain with the common-wealth, Locke contends, “because without this there can be no community, no common-wealth, which is contrary to the original agreement.” Thus, if for any reason the power of the government is dissolved or forfeited, “it reverts to the society, and the people have a right to act as supreme, and continue the legislative in themselves; or erect a new form, or under the old form place it in new hands, as they think good.” In other words, it is the common-wealth, or the people, who collectively hold the power after the dissolution of government.

Related Themes from Other Texts
Compare and contrast themes from other texts to this theme…
Get the entire Second Treatise of Government LitChart as a printable PDF.
Second Treatise of Government PDF

The Dissolution of Government Quotes in Second Treatise of Government

Below you will find the important quotes in Second Treatise of Government related to the theme of The Dissolution of Government.
Chapter 19: Of the Dissolution of Government Quotes

He that will with any clearness speak of the dissolution of government, ought in the first place to distinguish between the dissolution of the society and the dissolution of the government. That which makes the community, and brings men out of the loose state of nature, into one politic society, is the agreement which every one has with the rest to incorporate, and act as one body, and so be one distinct common-wealth. The usual, and almost only way whereby this union is dissolved, is the inroad of foreign force making a conquest upon them: for in that case, (not being able to maintain and support themselves, as one intire and independent body) the union belonging to that body which consisted therein, must necessarily cease, and so every one return to the state he was in before, with a liberty to shift for himself, and provide for his own safety, as he thinks fit, in some other society. Whenever the society is dissolved, it is certain the government of that society cannot remain.

Related Characters: John Locke (speaker)
Page Number: 107
Explanation and Analysis:

To conclude, the power that every individual gave the society, when he entered into it, can never revert to the individuals again, as long as the society lasts, but will always remain in the community; because without this there can be no community, no common-wealth, which is contrary to the original agreement; so also when the society hath placed the legislative in any assembly of men, to continue in them and their successors, with direction and authority for providing such successors, the legislative can never revert to the people whilst that government lasts; because having provided a legislative with power to continue for ever, they have given up their political power to the legislative, and cannot resume it.

Related Characters: John Locke (speaker)
Page Number: 123-124
Explanation and Analysis: