LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Survival in Auschwitz, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
Dehumanization and Resistance
Adaptability, Chance, and Survival
Moral Relativity
Racial Hierarchy
Oppression, Power, and Cruelty
Summary
Analysis
Levi states that thus far he has only described the workings of life itself in the Lager, but now he would like to offer his own analysis. In his eyes, “the Lager was pre-eminently a gigantic biological and social experiment,” since many men of different languages and traditions have been thrust together, left to survive or die by their own means. Although Levi admits that it could be argued that man is “fundamentally brutal, egoistic, or stupid in his conduct once every civilized institution is taken away,” Levi disagrees with this conclusion. Rather, he believes that in dire enough circumstances, man’s more civilized instincts and “social habits” are repressed.
Levi’s direct and insightful analysis of the concentration camps, based on personal experience and written only years after, make it fairly unique among other personal accounts of the Holocaust. Levi himself is quite clear on this matter, noting in his preface that he chooses to focus less on the daily suffering—though it is obviously still present—since that has been handled by other authors, and instead offer his insights on the psychology of the prisoners and their various methods of survival.
Active
Themes
Quotes
Levi posits that in the camp, there are two types of people: “the saved” and “the drowned.” Arguably, this distinction is more pertinent than good or bad, lucky or unlucky, since in the Lager, each person is “desperately and ferociously alone” and responsible for their own survival, without any social safety net to keep him from death or misery. The saved are those who learn to adapt themselves to the new environment of Auschwitz, who quickly learn how to “organize” extra rations, safer work, or fortuitous relationships with people in authority. The drowned, meanwhile, are those who do not organize, who pass their time thinking of home or complaining, and who quickly perish. Levi remarks that the few hundred Jewish prisoners who have survived more than three years, the first to arrive, did so only by ruthlessly organizing for their own survival, obtaining favorable positions and relationships.
That the delineation between those who survive and those who do not seems more pertinent to Levi than the divide between good and evil once again suggests that in such dire circumstances, morality itself becomes circumstantial, even secondary. This is particularly evident in the notion that those who survived often did so by forming good relationships with those who had power over them, especially the Germans. While from the reader’s point of view (existing in normal society), such an association with an evil figure may seem unconscionable, Levi argues that it is justified so long as it helps one to organize, adapt, and survive.
Active
Themes
Although in normal society, one might fall somewhere in between the drowned and the saved, in the Lager, there is no middle ground. Drowning is the easiest path to take, since it requires no action. One must simply eat what they are given, obey orders, and keep their head down until exhaustion, fatigue, or misfortune takes them. “The drowned form the backbone of the camp, an anonymous mass, continually renewed and always identical, of non-men who march in silence.” Levi reflects that if he could wrap all the evils of the Holocaust into one single image, it would be the picture of “an emaciated man, head dropped and shoulders curved, on whose face and in whose eyes not a trace of thought is to be seen.” He has seen thousands upon thousands of such men.
In its own way, the Lager functions as a microcosm of human society stripped down to the barest components of survival and with any social safety net or protective government removed. Although many of the basic interactions and relationships remain roughly the same—economics, establishment of a social hierarchy, and so on—the stakes are raised, and the consequences of failure are far higher. This explains then, why to simple carry on will inevitably mean death. If an individual is not willing to fight and scheme for his life every day, he cannot possibly survive.
Active
Themes
Quotes
Contrary to the drowned (who follow the single, easiest path downward), there are many paths to survival, though each are “difficult and improbable.” The most common strategy is to become a “prominent”: a Jewish camp official such as a Kapo, doctor, cook, or night-guard. Being a prominent is advantageous and hard-won, but the fear of losing their post for not being ruthless enough drives Jewish prominents to be even more vicious and violent towards their fellow Jewish people than the non-Jewish authority figures. For this reason, there is much hatred between the Jewish underlings and the Jewish superiors, even though most, given the opportunity, would take up such a role themselves. The non-Jewish prominents and Kapos are most often German criminals selected to supervise Jewish prisoners, or else Russian or Polish political prisoners.
Levi’s observations about Jewish prisoners who become Kapos and are given power over their comrades are particularly poignant and align with observations made in similar scenarios elsewhere in the world. The exceptional cruelty of the Jewish Kapos demonstrates that, when a formerly-oppressed person is suddenly given power over their fellows, most often they themselves become even worse oppressors, maximizing their use of their newfound power in order to gain a sense of justice for the cruelty that was inflicted against them.
Active
Themes
Quotes
Get the entire Survival in Auschwitz LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
Even among the Jewish underlings, many join the saved merely though their own willpower and ability to hustle and organize, fighting the overwhelming fatigue of the camp rather than submitting themselves to it. Some do this by letting go of their conscience completely and becoming ruthless and beastly towards their fellows. Others do it through extraordinary use of wit and cunning, though only “saints and martyrs” do not compromise their own morality in some fashion.
Once again, morality within a survival situation is suggested to be circumstantial rather than universal. Although many of the men contradict their own consciences to survive, Levi’s narration never condemns such action, even when it seems bestial, but rather treats it with understanding and even approval, indicating that what constitutes morality has entirely shifted in the context of Auschwitz.
Active
Themes
Levi demonstrates the dynamics of the saved and the damned through the stories of four men he knew. The first is a man named Schepschel, who though not particularly strong or cunning, occasionally steals brooms to sell to one of the block supervisors, and uses the capital he gains to have the cobbler improve his shoes. Sometimes people see him singing and dancing for the Slovak workers in exchange for a little extra soup. In a bid to gain favor with the Block commander and perhaps find a favorable work assignment, Schepschel betrays an accomplice to one of his thefts. In these ways, the man scratches out his own mere survival with what little faculties he has.
Schepschel provides an example of survival at any cost, particularly at the cost of one’s own dignity. Singing and dancing for dregs of soup and openly betraying his own accomplice suggests that Schepschel has abandoned all sense of decorum or pride. Although this allows him to survive and numbers him among the saved, it is hard not to see Schepschel’s self-demeaning behavior as dehumanizing himself, which thus makes it a victory for Nazi ideology.
Active
Themes
Alfred L., formerly an engineer and the head of a renowned chemical manufacturer, is in his mid-fifties and looks thin, rather than strong. Although he is an underling, L. has the self-control to live on only a portion of his bread ration, using the rest to buy soap with which to clean his face and razors to keep himself looking trim. He acts with the utmost decorum, even though it often disadvantages him, correctly making the long-term bet that if he appears like a prominent, he will eventually become one. When L. is appointed as the technical lead of the chemical Kommando, he uses his position to efficiently suppress any younger man who seems like he may at some point become a rival. Levi loses track of him, but believes it probable he survived Auschwitz and continues the “cold life of the determined and joyless dominator.”
Alfred L. is a foil to Schepschel’s self-demeaning survival. Rather than abandoning his own human dignity, L. capitalizes on the loss of dignity of his fellow Jewish prisoners by keeping himself looking clean, sharp, and distinguished amidst the throng of haggard men. While this seems like a nobler method of survival, it is still in itself quite cynical, as it takes advantage of the dehumanization of the people around him. However, once again, survival justifies the means, though it does not seem to endear Levi to L. at all.
Active
Themes
Elias Lindzin is short, squat, and powerful, with a body like Hercules and face “like a battering ram.” He is a tremendous worker, seemingly untiring, often carrying three or four times the loads of other prisoners. He also seems insane, constantly talking, making absurd speeches, doing grotesque impressions, running about, or disappearing. Despite this, he is so good-natured that everyone in the camp loves him. Before long, his reputation as a worker is such that he is set aside to be utilized only for special projects, meaning that he does not work much at all. Levi does not know what happens to Elias after the war is over, but he imagines that he would be ill-suited to civil society and would most likely be a criminal or asylum patient. But in the camp, he is unstoppable, and moreover seems genuinely happy.
Out of the four examples given (indeed, out of most characters in the story), Elias is easily the most suited to the grim, cruel life of the camp precisely because he would be ill-suited for the rest of society. Although there is little to be gleaned about survival from Elias’s manner of coping—since he is a rather abnormal individual—his odd suitability to the Lager once again demonstrates the manner in which the rules and strata of the outside world are inverted within the walls of the Lager. Those destined to be successful in the outside world are ill-suited to the camp, while those who do not fit in civil society find that they excel, even though imprisoned.
Active
Themes
Henri is a young, astute man, well-educated and well-read, with an almost frightening ability to understand a person’s motivations and weaknesses. Henri postulates that there are three effective methods of survival that will not make man into a beast: organization, pity, and theft. Henri uses all three, but is particularly skilled at manipulating pity and compassion to establish what seem like genuine friendships with people. In reality, they are ruthlessly calculated. Having earned the affection of the camp doctors and the most important prominents, soldiers, and civilians, Henri is easily sheltered from selection and hard labor and leverages his position to obtain many goods to sell. Henri seems warm and friendly, utterly human, until one realizes the scope of his cold, inhuman intellect. Levi knows that Henri is still alive and free somewhere, and is curious to know where, but never wants to meet the man again.
Henri represents the path to survival through shrewd manipulation and well-calculated schemes. Though he is not powerful like Elias or groveling like Schepschel, Henri’s survival, like Alfred L.’s, suggests that as physically demanding as the Lager is, it is perhaps even more advantageous to be cunning and ruthless. Although Henri manages to survive without demeaning or humiliating himself, thus resisting the dehumanization thrust upon him, his cold manipulation of other people still makes him a rather disturbing figure, even to Levi himself.