Beyond Good and Evil

by

Friedrich Nietzsche

Beyond Good and Evil: 9. What Is Noble Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Nietzsche believes that the advancement of humankind requires an aristocratic, stratified society in which some have the “pathos of distance” to overcome themselves. Unlike some, however, Nietzsche has no illusions about this process: aristocratic societies are created when powerful barbarian races conquer weaker races and install themselves as an elite, noble caste. These warriors are philosophers too because their physical strength draws on “strength of the soul,” the capacity for both destruction and creation. A true aristocracy, Nietzsche contends, is not a function of society but the very meaning of society; the former understanding is what led to the French nobility’s downfall. As higher beings, the noble must have complete faith that their existence justifies the sacrifice of others. When they lose this faith, corruption and the loss of their nobility sets in.
Nietzsche supports his vision of an ideal society with a naturalistic, historical argument for conquest and rule which closely mirrors biological theories of the time, including those of Darwin and Spencer. Nietzsche, however, does not see this as a natural, material process alone—instead, he sees it as inherently connected to the birth of true philosophy. Nietzsche’s vision of an aristocracy remains vague, as he explicitly disavows the French nobility at the time of the French Revolution but does not give readers guidance about how to distinguish between a genuine and a false nobility. By Nietzsche’s measure, no genuine nobility is in power anywhere in 19th-century Europe, which perhaps suggests that he is proposing a more metaphorical understanding of the word. 
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
Knowledge, Truth, and Untruth Theme Icon
The Dark Side of Modernity Theme Icon
The principle of equality cannot be a principle of society, Nietzsche finds, however appropriate it may be among individuals of the same status. On such a wide scale, equality is a denial of life, which deep down is the will to power in all its forms. Exploitation, therefore, is a category of life, not a social evil to be abolished. Seen from this perspective, Nietzsche finds in the diversity of moralities two basic types: the master morality and the slave morality. These moralities often appear together, either in hybrid forms or simultaneously within the same culture or person. The master morality centers on an order of rank in which “good” and “noble” are synonymous and all else is “contemptible.” This morality sees itself as the creator of values. It honors tradition and the past over the future and the ideals of progress.
Nietzsche’s rejection of equality as a moral principle is a rejection not only of modern democracy, but also of all its viable 19th-century alternatives, such as socialism and anarchism. Here Nietzsche defines at last the mode of thinking he finds at the root of all these modern philosophies and movements: slave morality. While the slave morality and the herd man are not interchangeable concepts, they are intimately linked.
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
The Individual and the Crowd Theme Icon
The Dark Side of Modernity Theme Icon
Quotes
The slave morality, on the other hand, derives from the suffering and oppression of those who believe in it. It is skeptical, suspicious, and pessimistic, and prides itself on virtues “of utility” such as patience, friendliness, and hard work. Nietzsche locates the two moralities in relation to good and evil: to the master morality, those who hold power and inspire fear are good, while to the slave morality, it is precisely the powerful who are evil. To Nietzsche, the good person of the slave morality is necessarily a safe, unthreatening, and even stupid individual. The desire for freedom, too, is characteristic of the slave morality, while the master morality practices reverence and devotion.
Nietzsche pointedly describes the slave morality in very similar terms to that of Christianity, emphasizing that Christianity and the slave morality have the same values. As he describes the slave morality it is clear that this, too, is the morality of democracy, and of the herd man, which has become practically universal in modern European society.
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
The Individual and the Crowd Theme Icon
The noble individual, utterly sure of their own worth, cannot be vain and does not understand the vanity of others. Concern for the opinions of others, rather, is characteristic of the slave morality, as slaves historically could not create values for themselves but had values attached to them by their masters. Nietzsche finds this “atavism” of vanity to appear in both Christianity and the behavior of women, among other places. Nietzsche advocates a historical theory of peoples as “species,” cultivating and maintaining the virtues that make them hard and strong as they struggle against unfavorable conditions. When these conditions disappear, however, their safety and security enables a degeneration into “monstrosities.” In these moments, however, the breakdown of past moralities enables individuals to break free of them and create new virtues. The growing power of the mediocre, however, is an ominous development which may prevent the birth of new moralities.
Nietzsche distinguishes self-worth from vanity, arguing that the latter is not the expression of the former; instead, vanity suggests a lack of self-worth. Moreover, Nietzsche finds that vanity is becoming increasingly widespread in modern society, a trend he links with the slave morality’s increasing predominance. Nietzsche’s understanding of virtues and their development over time draws heavily from biology and theories of natural selection. As much as Nietzsche desires the creation of a new, noble society based on an order of rank, he seems to fear that the degeneration of such a society into slave morality is almost inevitable.
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
The Individual and the Crowd Theme Icon
The Dark Side of Modernity Theme Icon
Get the entire Beyond Good and Evil LitChart as a printable PDF.
Beyond Good and Evil PDF
The desire for rank is, to Nietzsche, a sign of high rank in the individual who feels it. With this too comes the instinct for reverence; in the Bible Nietzsche finds a rare instance of an appropriate channeling of that instinct in Christianity, as Europeans submitted to an external authority greater than themselves. Indeed, the fact that the Bible is a privileged text that the crowd does not have direct access to makes it that much more meaningful. Nietzsche also believes that the soul carries on the characteristics of its ancestors. Despite one’s deceptions, the origin—and rank—of an individual always comes out in their behavior.
Nietzsche’s explanation of high rank here offers the reader little evidence or explanation of its place in modern society. Instead, he provides a redundant definition which leaves open the possibility that he understands nobility in a primarily metaphorical sense, though this interpretation does not explain nobility’s role in his vision of the future. The reader should be aware that Nietzsche’s praise of the Bible’s function as privileged text is particular to Catholicism; when the Bible is translated into vernacular languages, it is no longer separated from the crowd.
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
Knowledge, Truth, and Untruth Theme Icon
The Individual and the Crowd Theme Icon
The noble soul, to Nietzsche, is always egoistic. It has no qualms about hardness or cruelty, understanding itself to be the source of justice. When the noble soul is deferential it is only to others of its rank, which it treats the same way it would treat itself. The noble soul looks downwards, understanding itself to be above the crowd. As the noble soul is self-assured, it does not have to seek itself. The modern European, on the other hand, practices a “self-diminution” of the soul. Nietzsche then asks what it means to have experiences in common. Peoples who live in similar conditions develop a shared understanding, which leads them to associate more closely with each other, and in turn become more like each other. This naturally leads to the herd man, and “tremendous counter-forces” are needed to develop humankind in other directions. 
Nietzsche’s characterization of the noble soul continues to leave open the possibility that nobility is an attitude and not a social position. Indeed, for Nietzsche, nobility seems to disdain worldly affairs. Nietzsche’s assurance that a noble morality would more truly express human nature seems to contradict his anxiety that there is a natural tendency toward slave morality and the herd man as society develops. While Nietzsche focuses on the need for nobility in a modern world dominated by slave morality, he does not explain the role he envisions for slave morality in a society rightfully controlled by the noble.
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
Knowledge, Truth, and Untruth Theme Icon
The Individual and the Crowd Theme Icon
The Dark Side of Modernity Theme Icon
Psychologists, Nietzsche argues, cannot succumb to pity as they attempt to understand other humans. As a higher type of human, the psychologist must be hard to avoid corruption, but Nietzsche finds this almost unavoidable process of corruption to be the rule rather than the exception.  This may be an impossible task, and the psychologist instead develops a pity and contempt for those whom the crowd considers “great men.” Nietzsche compares such individuals to sacrificial animals and argues that it is their work that makes them great rather than the other way around; to him, they are false historical “rules,” and as examples do not explain the nature of greatness in the way that their advocates think they do. Nietzsche disparages the individual characters of great poets, arguing that as men they are not of a higher rank. Then, speaking of both women and Jesus, Nietzsche bemoans the insufficiency of love, which cannot satisfy the demands humans make of it.
Here Nietzsche explains his theory of “great men,” their achievements, and their eventual corruption. He argues that these individuals and their work are always distorted by the crowd, and that we should praise their work while feeling both pity and contempt for the individuals themselves, who are made into idols. Such allegedly great individuals are in fact the invention of the great work they created, mistakenly praised by the crowd when they are themselves merely flawed people made to stand in for their successes, which to Nietzsche should be treated as having a life of their own.
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
Knowledge, Truth, and Untruth Theme Icon
The Individual and the Crowd Theme Icon
The Dark Side of Modernity Theme Icon
Women and Men Theme Icon
True and profound suffering makes one noble and separates one from the crowd, Nietzsche argues. This too leads to a “spiritual haughtiness,” though it is sometimes disguised as cheerfulness or even foolishness. Perhaps, Nietzsche suggests, it is more refined to respect such masks and avoid psychology altogether. He then argues that cleanliness is a great divider of individuals. Saintliness, as the highest form of cleanliness, separates the saint from society; the saint’s pity for society, then, is pity for their human uncleanliness. Nobility, to Nietzsche, also consists of fulfilling one’s duties alone, understanding that they cannot be delegated. The graciousness of nobility requires having reached one’s “height”; until then the noble individual demands solitude and separation from others.
By emphasizing the importance of masks and disguise, Nietzsche leaves unclear what nobility looks like in modern society, and he seemingly contradicts his earlier assertion that one noble soul can clearly recognize another. He reaffirms, however, that separation from the crowd is a central feature of nobility, although this separation may not be literal; nevertheless, the noble soul knows that it is different from the crowd and therefore exists in its solitude.
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
The Individual and the Crowd Theme Icon
Nietzsche wonders how many higher individuals are waiting for their moment, a moment which never comes in time and thus forecloses their chance at greatness; he suggests that it is not genius that is rare, but the right time for genius that often fails to appear. The lower soul, while often failing to see greatness, is more durable and resistant to the conditions of life than the higher soul. Nietzsche argues that humans with noble souls often learn what is most important too late, always seek to disguise themselves, and generally feel a sense of profound dislocation and sadness in the modern world. All the same, solitude is a virtue for the noble, as society is inevitably unclean and corrupting.
Nietzsche’s description of the noble soul as dormant, lying in wait for the appropriate conditions in which to flourish, adds further confusion to the meaning of nobility. Nietzsche clearly is not arguing that anyone has the potential for nobility, but at the same time clearly does not believe that nobility corresponds directly to social class or status in the modern world. Moreover, he casts the noble soul in a profoundly melancholic light, suggesting that the experience of the noble soul is always one of failure and retreat.
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
Knowledge, Truth, and Untruth Theme Icon
The Individual and the Crowd Theme Icon
Great events—and thoughts—are experienced not in the moment but by their aftereffects, Nietzsche argues, comparing them to the light of distant stars. Asking how one can recognize the noble in the modern world without being deceived by misinterpretation, Nietzsche claims that it is the noble soul’s faith in and reverence for itself that distinguishes it. Nietzsche then returns to the ways in which individuals disguise their spirit and even their philosophy; he suggests that every book one writes conceals truer, deeper thoughts, and indeed every philosophy is a mask that hides another philosophy beneath it. To Nietzsche truly profound thinkers prefer to be misunderstood than understood, as they do not wish their followers to suffer like they have. 
Nietzsche once again compares psychology to astronomy, asserting the central role interpretation plays in divining the truth. This interpretation must take place after the fact, implying that it is in fact impossible to tell who among us is great. While Nietzsche continues to assert that there are various means by which to recognize the noble soul, he provides equally strong arguments that it’s impossible to recognize nobility, at least not by its contemporaries, a contradiction he leaves unresolved; perhaps he too prefers to be misunderstood than understood in this case. 
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
Knowledge, Truth, and Untruth Theme Icon
The Individual and the Crowd Theme Icon
Quotes
Nietzsche suggests that morality is a way of simplifying the complexities of the soul, involving such deception that it should be considered an art in its own right. The philosopher, he argues, experiences their thoughts as external, and is always escaping and returning to themselves. Pity in a true master, Nietzsche claims, possesses a value that it cannot have when it comes from those who suffer, or when it is preached to society at large. This pity is rather a sensitivity to pain that has become a “cult of suffering.”
Returning to the question of morality’s function, Nietzsche restates here the argument made in “What Is Religious,” suggesting that morality streamlines the processes of the soul. While his rejection of pity as a social virtue remains consistent, he doesn’t explain what distinguishes the pity of a master from the pity of slave morality.
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
Knowledge, Truth, and Untruth Theme Icon
Criticizing Hobbes, Nietzsche advocates laughter as a great virtue, citing the mockery of ancient gods as an example. Nietzsche then praises the Greek god Dionysus for his honesty and lack of shame. Dionysus, a lover of humankind, wishes to make humans “stronger, more evil, and profound.” While Nietzsche supports this, he also argues that Dionysus can learn from humankind, and that humans are “more humane.” Nietzsche then speaks directly to his thoughts, expressing surprise at how they grow and wither as he writes them down, losing the sense of novelty and joy they first gave him. No one, he claims, will fully understand them; nobody will see his thoughts in all the “colors” that he imagined them, as they leave him to go out to the world.
Nietzsche’s critique of Hobbes once again reaffirms his distaste for the serious, mechanistic effect of English philosophy; to Nietzsche, Hobbes’s humorlessness is not only an irritating stylistic feature but a symptom of the moral prejudices of his philosophy. Nietzsche reaffirms the importance of critical mockery to the true philosopher, arguing that this is an expression of a Dionysian affect: the embrace of human nature’s most vibrant aspects. Nietzsche, while clearly advocating the Dionysian view of humankind, also expresses a strange hesitation, ascribing a positive value to the “humane” that seems to contradict his criticisms of morality. Nietzsche then affirms once more his belief that nobility is doomed to be misunderstood, expressing the fear that his words—this book—will puzzle readers to come.
Themes
Good and Evil Theme Icon
Knowledge, Truth, and Untruth Theme Icon
The Dark Side of Modernity Theme Icon